But what he was actually doing was defending the abuse of power and, however inadvertently, demonstrating that our institutions may face no threat quite so grave as that posed by self-anointed “institutionalists.” Garland’s position was defended by allies who argued that he was an “institutionalist” who felt it was his duty to defend presidential prerogatives. Jean Carroll following her accusation that Trump had raped her long before he was elected president. A particularly egregious example of this was Garland’s decision to take the side of Trump by arguing that the former president was acting in his official capacity when he lied and defamed journalist E. Garland has, on more than one occasion, already taken steps that have actually empowered or emboldened those who currently pose a threat to our system.
0 kommentar(er)
